In Re the Exxon Valdez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reducing the award from $5 billion to $4.5 billion following an additional remand for reconsideration in light of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 123 S.Ct. 1513, 155 L.Ed.2d 585 (2003)
• reducing the award from $5 billion to $4.5 billion following an additional remand for reconsideration in light of State Farm Mutual Auto- mobile Insurance Co. v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003)
• “[A]fter judgment was entered on the punitive damages award, Exxon’s treasurer advised the court that ‘the full payment of the Judgment would not have a material impact on the corporation or its credit quality.’ ”
• “[A]fter judgment was entered on the punitive damages award, Exxon’s treasurer advised the court that ‘the full payment of the Judgment would not have a material impact on the corporation or its credit quality.’ ”
• “[A]fter judgment was entered on the punitive damages award, Exxon’s treasurer advised the court that 'the full payment of the Judgment would not have a material impact on the corporation or its credit quality.' ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).