In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the cumulative effect of errors did not require reversal where there was substantial evidence of the defendant’s guilt
• stating that credibility determinations, weighing of evidence, and drawing of legitimate inferences from facts are functions within discretion of fact-finder and, ordinarily, will not be overturned
• explaining that the board does not need to treat the ALJ’s recommendation with the same deference an appellate court must accord the findings of a trial court
• noting that appellate courts “defer to an agency’s conclusions regarding conflicts in testimony”
• stating that we defer to the agency to resolve conflicting testimony
• agency’s conclusions not arbitrary and capricious so long as a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made has been articulated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).