In re the Estate of Vandemark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that dismissal based on “defect in subject matter jurisdiction . . . must be one without prejudice.”
• explaining that dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction must be without prejudice
• explaining that dismissals for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction must be without prejudice
• “A dismissal for lack of standing—or any defect in subject matter jurisdiction—must be one without prejudice, because a court has no power to adjudicate and dispose of a claim on the merits.” (cleaned up)
• “We review de novo a district court’s dismissal of a complaint for want of Article III standing to sue — and thus for lack of subject matter jurisdiction — under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).