· 5/31/1996
In re the Estate of Shoemaker
Citations
- 22 Kan. App. 2d 444
- 917 P.2d 897
- 1996 Kan. App. LEXIS 59
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because [the plaintiffs] have not shown they sustained any other deprivations of liberty in connection with their receipt of the summonses, they have failed to show they were seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: From, Green, Holding, Marquardt, Pierron, Respectfully
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.