Skip to main content
· 4/26/1994

In re the Estate of Sandler

Citations

  • 160 Misc. 2d 955
  • 612 N.Y.S.2d 756
  • 1994 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]wo layers of for-cause protection” for inferior officers is forbidden under “Supreme Court Precedent”
  • holding that “[t]wo layers of for-cause protection” for inferior officers is forbidden under “Supreme Court Precedent”
  • holding that “[t]wo layers of for-cause protection” for inferior officers is forbidden under “Supreme Court Precedent”
  • holding that the intelligible principle standard means “that a total absence of guidance is impermissible under the Constitution”
  • holding that the Sev- enth Amendment jury-trial right applies to SEC actions seeking civil penalties for violations of securities-fraud statutes
  • noting that SEC ALJ decisions “often . . . are final and binding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.