In re the Estate of Meisler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that at the motion to dismiss stage, courts may not consider “[f]actual claims and assertions raised by a defendant”
• utilizing, on an appeal from a motion to dismiss, a 71 “motivating factor” standard under Title IX without addressing Nassar or other Supreme Court precedent
• stating a motion to dismiss is not the proper place to resolve factual disputes
• “[A] court must ‘accept all factual allegations in the complaint as true and view them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.””’
• “When the truth of facts in an ‘integral’ document are contested by the well-pleaded facts of a complaint, the facts in the complaint must prevail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).