· 12/23/1976
In re the Estate of Mastrianni
Citations
- 55 A.D.2d 784
- 389 N.Y.S.2d 914
- 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15577
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding with respect to peculiar knowledge that “[tjhere are triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants knew that the apple juice concentrate was adulterated”
- applying three year limitations period of CPLR § 214(4) and (5)
- “In a fraud action, whether a party could have ascertained the facts with reasonable diligence so as to negate justifiable reliance is a factual question.”
- “In a fraud action, whether a party could have ascertained the facts with reasonable diligence so as to negate justifiable reliance is a factual question.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.