Skip to main content
· 12/23/1976

In re the Estate of Mastrianni

Citations

  • 55 A.D.2d 784
  • 389 N.Y.S.2d 914
  • 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding with respect to peculiar knowledge that “[tjhere are triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants knew that the apple juice concentrate was adulterated”
  • applying three year limitations period of CPLR § 214(4) and (5)
  • “In a fraud action, whether a party could have ascertained the facts with reasonable diligence so as to negate justifiable reliance is a factual question.”
  • “In a fraud action, whether a party could have ascertained the facts with reasonable diligence so as to negate justifiable reliance is a factual question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.