Skip to main content
· 9/23/1942

In re the Estate of Goodman

Citations

  • 264 A.D. 987
  • 37 N.Y.S.2d 493
  • 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the presence of an objecting co-occupant at the scene of the search does not invalidate the consent of another co-occupant with “common authority”
  • holding that the presence of an objecting co-occupant at the scene of the search does not invalidate the consent of another co-occupant with \common authority\
  • upholding fiancee's consent to search apartment shared with defendant where she took initiative to summon police because defendant was storing drugs in a closet used by both of them
  • upholding fiancee’s consent to search apartment shared with defendant where she took initiative to summon police because defendant was storing drugs in a closet used by both of them
  • upholding fiancee's consent to search apartment shared with defendant where she took initiative to summon police because defendant was storing drugs in a closet used by both of them
  • upholding fiancee’s consent to search apartment shared with defendant where she took initiative to summon police because defendant was storing drugs in a closet used by both of them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.