Skip to main content
· 7/6/1988

In re the Estate of Bauman

Citations

  • 140 Misc. 2d 412
  • 530 N.Y.S.2d 765
  • 1988 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[b]ecause mandamus relief and relief under the APA are in essence the same,” the court “may elect to analyze the APA claim only” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that “discretion over how 2 to investigate is different from discretion over whether to investigate” and that the regulations 3 “neither provide nor suggest that [the agency] has discretion whether to investigate a complaint”
  • finding 20 district court had federal question subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff’s APA claim alleging 21 government agency failed to perform its duty within a reasonable time
  • setting forth factors to determine if an agency action is unreasonably delayed
  • “Repeatedly, courts in this and other circuits have 5 concluded that a reasonable time for agency action is typically counted in weeks or months, not 6 years.”
  • “Repeatedly, courts in this and other 6 circuits have concluded that a reasonable time for agency action is typically counted in weeks or 7 months, not years.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lambert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.