Skip to main content
· 6/17/1985

In re the Discipline of Middleton

Citations

  • 370 N.W.2d 421
  • 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1095

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that public employee’s breach of duty of fair representation claim “does not arise under the LMRA, but rather as a private cause of action under State law for breach of contract”
  • the MTA, the plaintiff’s employer, “is an agency and instrumentality of the State of Maryland”
  • “The duty of fair representation does not arise under the LMRA, but rather as a private cause of action under State law for breach of contract.”
  • “The duty of fair representation does not arise under the LMRA, but rather as a private cause of action under State law for breach of contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.