Skip to main content
· 12/12/1985

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McLeod

Citations

  • 711 P.2d 310
  • 104 Wash. 2d 859
  • 1985 Wash. LEXIS 1302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the Board's recommendation should be affirmed unless this court can articulate a specific reason to reject the recommendation\, following In re Stock, 104 Wn.2d 273, 284, 704 P.2d 611 (1985) and In re Noble, 100 Wn.2d 88, 95, 667 P.2d 608 (1983)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dolliver, Utter, Brachtenbach, Pearson, Andersen, Callow, Durham, Cunningham, Tern, Dore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.