Skip to main content
· 6/8/1978

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Donohoe

Citations

  • 580 P.2d 1093
  • 90 Wash. 2d 173
  • 1978 Wash. LEXIS 1200

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • imposing censure for failure to disclose conflict in representing both a judgment creditor and a judgment debtor
  • imposing censure for failure to disclose conflict in representing both a judgment creditor and a judgment debtor
  • rejecting First Amendment challenge to restriction on judicial candidate’s speech where statement made with “knowledge of its falsity”
  • rejecting First Amendment challenge to restriction on judicial candidate’s speech where statement made with “knowledge of its falsity”
  • in the context of a judicial campaign, there are other competing societal concerns that override the need for unrestrained freedom of speech
  • would enforce DRA 6.4 regarding timely filing of briefs but \we note that we have reviewed all of the testimony and documents so as to insure appellant a fair review even though she has not followed the applicable rules\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brachtenbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.