In re the Disciplinary Action Against Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding harmlessness based on defendant's trial testimony that he lived in the residence the crime occurred for 19 years before the offense
• review of the issue necessarily involves factual conclusions, and the right to a unanimous verdict is statutory in Kansas rather than fundamental
• review of the issue necessarily involves factual conclusions, and the right to a unanimous verdict is statutory in Kansas rather than fundamental
• if constitutional harmless error standard is met, then lower statutory standard under K.S.A. 60-261 is also satisfied
• a defendant has the right to have all the elements of the charged crime decided by the jury under the Sixth Amendment and §10 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights
• errors are harmless if the record contains no evidence which \'could rationally lead to a contrary finding with respect to the element that the defendant was over the age of 18 at the time of the crime'\ [quoting State v. Reyna, 290 Kan. 666, 682, 234 P.3d 761 (2010)]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).