In re the Disability Proceeding against Keefe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an in-person evaluation . . . may have strengthened [the expert’s] testimony,” but the evidence rules do not “require such firsthand knowledge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Schierman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2015-05-05· cited 62×
• Gerlach v. The Cove Apartments, LLC
  Washington Supreme Court· 2020-08-27· cited 28×
• State v. Lui
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-11-23· cited 25×
• State v. Schierman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2018-04-12· cited 16×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Roberts
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-12-14· cited 341×
• In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Poole
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-01-05· cited 67×
• Sunbreaker Condominium Ass'n v. Travelers Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1995-09-18· cited 48×
• Brown v. Department of Health
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-12-17· cited 42×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Bonet
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-08-23· cited 37×
• State v. Gwaltney
  Washington Supreme Court· 1970-04-23· cited 19×
• In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Meade
  Washington Supreme Court· 1985-01-10· cited 14×
• In Re Disability Proceeding Against Diamondstone
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-01-20· cited 13×
• In re the Disability Proceeding Against Diamondstone
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-01-20· cited 13×
• In Re Campbell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1968-08-15· cited 7×
• In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Ryan
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-05-06· cited 5×