· 12/3/1999
In Re the Detention of R.W.
Citations
- 988 P.2d 1034
- 98 Wash. App. 140
- 1999 Wash. App. LEXIS 2050
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the \great weight\ instruction was an improper comment on the evidence
- issue of admissibility of transcript testimony was moot because it involved private question, would not likely recur, and was a matter of discretion
- in civil commitment proceeding, the likeliness that issue will recur justified court reaching moot issue
- a court makes an impermissible comment on the evidence when it instructs the jury as to the weight it should give certain evidence
- issue of admissibility of transcript testimony was moot because it involved private question, would not likely recur, and was a matter of discretion
- judge instructed jury that “ ‘great weight’ ” should be given to evidence regarding a defendant’s “ ‘prior history of decompensation leading to repeated hospitalizations or law enforcement interventions’ ” (emphasis omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridgewater
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.