Skip to main content
· 12/3/1999

In Re the Detention of R.W.

Citations

  • 988 P.2d 1034
  • 98 Wash. App. 140
  • 1999 Wash. App. LEXIS 2050

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the \great weight\ instruction was an improper comment on the evidence
  • issue of admissibility of transcript testimony was moot because it involved private question, would not likely recur, and was a matter of discretion
  • in civil commitment proceeding, the likeliness that issue will recur justified court reaching moot issue
  • a court makes an impermissible comment on the evidence when it instructs the jury as to the weight it should give certain evidence
  • issue of admissibility of transcript testimony was moot because it involved private question, would not likely recur, and was a matter of discretion
  • judge instructed jury that “ ‘great weight’ ” should be given to evidence regarding a defendant’s “ ‘prior history of decompensation leading to repeated hospitalizations or law enforcement interventions’ ” (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridgewater

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.