Skip to main content
· 4/2/2013

In re the Detention of J.L.

Citations

  • 174 Wash. App. 1032

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appointing a special master to prepare recommendations to the Supreme Court regarding the implementation of the unified judicial system
  • successor ruling by Supreme Court which held that the doctrine of separation of powers does not preclude judicial determination of state funding obligations
  • mandamus will not lie to control discretionary acts, but “courts will review the exercise of the actor’s discretion where it is arbitrary or fraudulently exercised or is based upon a mistaken view of the law”
  • mandamus will not lie to control discretionary acts, but “courts will review the exercise of the actor’s discretion where it is arbitrary or fraudulently exercised or is based ■ upon a mistaken view of the law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bjorgen, Brintnall, Hunt, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.