In re the Decision of the State Water Management Board Approving Water Permit No. 1791-2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 6.02[a][5] is to be strictly enforced
• declining to reach the merits where the brief makes no effort to explain why appellate review of an unpreserved constitutional issue is warranted
• requiring strict enforcement of Rule 6.02[a][5] and holding litigants who fail to comply risk a ruling that the issue is improperly briefed
• prescribing strict enforcement of Supreme Court Rule 6.02(a)(5) [2020 Kan. S. Ct. R. 34]
• constitutional grounds for reversal asserted for the first time on appeal are not properly before the appellate court for review
• \We are now sufficiently post-Williams that litigants have no excuse for noncompliance with Rule 6.02[a][5].\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).