In Re the Complaint of Beesley's Point Sea-Doo, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a letter conferred notice where it provided an opinion about what caused claimant’s injuries, offered a theory of liability, and listed the medical expenses
• noting that “‘claims for personal injuries and property damages’ [is] a term commonly used to describe the subject of a legal action’
• noting that 20 counsel’s reference to “claims” is “a clear indicia of the possibility of commencement of legal proceedings”
• reasoning that the court must consider the “whole tenor” of the letter and not apply Richardson factors too narrowly and concluding that the letter constituted written notice of a claim “although the letter does not include an express ‘demand of a right or supposed right’”
• letter was captioned “Gillespie vs. Beesley’s Point Sea Doo, Inc. t/a Sea Isle Sea Doo, et al” with the date of the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).