In re the Committed Intimate Relationship of Ingram

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a public school’s use for asbestos-abatement services was a governmental purpose not amenable to a private action under the UTPCPL.
• rejecting an individual’s attempt to bring UTPCPL claims as a representative of a school district’s taxpayers and students because he was not their legal representative
• determining school district’s purchase of asbestos abatement services was not primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, and it could not maintain private cause of action under UTPCPL against asbestos removal company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).