In Re the Commitment of Golub v. Giles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence sufficient to support finding that patient was gravely disabled where he suffered paranoia and delusional thoughts, engaged in threatening and destructive behavior, and refused to cooperate with anti- psychotic drug treatment
• determining the proof necessary for involuntary commitment is an issue of great importance that is likely to recur
• holding evidence sufficient to demonstrate grave disability
• \The question of how persons subject to involuntary commitment are treated by our trial courts is one of great importance to society.\
• history of hospitalizations and deterioration of behavior was sufficient to demonstrate Golub was gravely disabled
• patient’s refusal to accept his mental illness and cooperate with his treatment, paired with his history of mental health issues and destructive behavior, was sufficient to support a finding of grave disability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).