In re the Claims of Michael

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that statement that company was a “safe investment” was inactionable puffery
• noting that an assurances that a venture is a- “safe investment” are “generally considered, not actionable statements of fact, but ..mere opinion and puf-fery”
• noting that \good faith ... is a subjective and not an objective standard\
• “The documents provided to defendant were received after he made the investment, and thus the required element of reliance is absent.”
• representation of investment’s safety, received after the investment was made, not actionable in fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).