Skip to main content
· 6/20/1991

In re the Claim of Stevenson

Citations

  • 174 A.D.2d 920
  • 571 N.Y.S.2d 830
  • 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • filing deadline applies to motions to reopen based on lack of oral notice
  • a motion to reopen an in absentia order in order to apply for adjustment of status is subject to requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)
  • a motion to reopen an in absentia order to apply for adjustment of status is subject to the 90-day motion to reopen deadline
  • a motion to reopen in absentia proceeding to apply for new relief is subject to requirements of 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)
  • a motion to reopen seeking only to apply for relief unavailable to the movant at the time of the hearing is still subject to the regulatory requirements governing motions to reopen, including the filing deadline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.