Skip to main content
· 6/9/1983

In re the Claim of Hirschfield

Citations

  • 95 A.D.2d 908
  • 464 N.Y.S.2d 54
  • 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • continuous treatment doctrine did not apply when there was no evidence of contact between plaintiff and defendant between successive computerized tomography (CT) scans or that further treatment after first CT scan was anticipated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.