In re the Claim of Brannigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that burden of proof for constructive fraud under MUFTA is in doubt and citing Law Court case that suggested plaintiff must meet clear and convincing evidence standard
• “[I]t is clear by the operation of [Sections] 724(a) and 726(a)(4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).