In re the Claim of Bhaviakhinmontes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the construction company was merely an incidental beneficiary, not a third-party beneficiary, to a contract between an architect and the county
• finding that the construction company was merely an incidental beneficiary, not a third-party beneficiary, to a contract between an architect and the county
• dismissal of plaintiffs complaint was proper on third-party beneficiary claim where contract stated that services would run directly to other contracting party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).