In Re the Care & Treatment of Corley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the SCRE, particularly Rules 401 and 403, in an SVP matter
• affirming admission of indictments notwithstanding appellant’s willingness to stipulate to the prior convictions because “the details of appellant’s prior offenses ... were relevant to the issue of whether appellant was likely to engage in acts of sexual violence again
• evidence is relevant if it tends to establish or make more or less probable the matter in controversy
• evidence of prior acts admissible because “a person’s dangerous propensities are the focus of the SVP Act”
• evidence of prior acts admissible because “a person’s dangerous propensities are the focus of the SVP Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).