· 9/15/1989
In Re the Baltimore Sun Company v. The Honorable Clarence E. Goetz, United States Magistrate
Citations
- 886 F.2d 60
- 16 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2295
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13992
- 1989 WL 105156
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that search warrant affidavits are judicial records to which the public has a common law qualified right of access
- concluding that “the common sense reason why proceedings for search warrants are not open to the public” applies when considering disclosure of search warrant affidavits
- holding that because proceedings for the issuance of search warrants are not open to the public, there is no first amendment right of access to search warrant affidavits
- observing that the Supreme Court has twice “recognized that proceedings for the issuance of search warrants are not open”
- holding that “affidavits for search warrants are judicial records”
- concluding that pre-indictment search warrant materials are judicial records
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ervin, Russell, Butzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.