Skip to main content
· 9/15/1989

In Re the Baltimore Sun Company v. The Honorable Clarence E. Goetz, United States Magistrate

Citations

  • 886 F.2d 60
  • 16 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2295
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 13992
  • 1989 WL 105156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that search warrant affidavits are judicial records to which the public has a common law qualified right of access
  • concluding that “the common sense reason why proceedings for search warrants are not open to the public” applies when considering disclosure of search warrant affidavits
  • holding that because proceedings for the issuance of search warrants are not open to the public, there is no first amendment right of access to search warrant affidavits
  • observing that the Supreme Court has twice “recognized that proceedings for the issuance of search warrants are not open”
  • holding that “affidavits for search warrants are judicial records”
  • concluding that pre-indictment search warrant materials are judicial records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ervin, Russell, Butzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.