In Re the Attorney General, Stephan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that 'no claim or showing of gerrymandering . . . ha[d] been made'
• concluding that 'no claim or showing of gerrymandering . . . ha[d] been made'
• \Substantially equal districts may be invidiously discriminatory because they were organized in such a way as to minimize or cancel out the voting strength of racial or political elements of the voting population.\
• \Substantially equal [legislative] districts may be 62 invidiously discriminatory because they were organized in such a way as to minimize or cancel out the voting strength of racial or political elements of the voting population.\
• \Substantially equal [legislative] districts may be 62 invidiously discriminatory because they were organized in such a way as to minimize or cancel out the voting strength of racial or political elements of the voting population.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).