In re the Arbitration between Local One, Amalgamated Lithographers & Stearns & Beale, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that North Carolina appellate precedent concerning apportionment of attorneys’ fees relies upon the reasoning in Hensley
• finding evidence that Plaintiff earned the bonus under Defendant's bonus policy substantiated denial of motions for directed verdict
• “Interpreting subsection 25.22(d) of the [NC]WHA, we have held that ‘a trial court’s decision regarding whether or not to award attorney[’s] fees . . . is reviewed for abuse of discretion.’” (citation and brackets omitted
• “Interpreting subsection 25.22(d) of the [NC]WHA, we have held that ‘a trial court’s decision regarding whether or not to award attorney[’s] fees . . . is reviewed for abuse of discretion.’” (citation and brackets omitted) rev’d on other grounds, 368 N.C. 857, 788 S.E.2d 154 (2016)
• enforcing employee’s right to earned bonus under the NCWHA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).