In re the Arbitration between Daly & Criterion Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ALJs must explain 23 how they considered the supportability and consistency factors before rejecting a medical 24 opinion
• holding that the “specific and legitimate” standard is “incompatible” and “clearly irreconcilable” with the revised regulations
• holding that the ALJ “reasonably rejected” a doctor’s opinion where the opinion was inconsistent with “treatment notes”
• holding that an ALJ 18 can reject a doctor’s opinion as unsupported or inconsistent if the ALJ provides an 19 explanation supported by substantial evidence
• holding that, under the new 6 regulations, “an ALJ’s decision . . . must simply be supported by substantial evidence”
• holding that the plaintiff received conservative treatment when she treated her symptoms “mostly with medication alone until she received a left knee injection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).