Skip to main content
· 11/9/1983

In re the Appointment of a Member of the Board of Bar Examiners

Citations

  • 339 N.W.2d 797
  • 1983 S.D. LEXIS 503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing district court's general discretion to determine whether sentence should run concurrent with or consecutive to another sentence
  • applying an abuse of discretion standard to review non-KSGA sentences; noting a district court abuses its discretion by acting unreasonably
  • discussing parties' assumption of risk that sentencing court will impose sentence different than sentence recommended in nonbinding plea agreement
  • finding the abuse of discretion standard still applies to disposition decisions under K.S.A. 22-3716[c][9]
  • applying an abuse of discretion standard to review non-Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act sentences
  • judicial action an abuse of discretion if it is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable; is based on error of law; or is based on error of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.