Skip to main content
· 12/8/1989

In Re the Appeal of A. M. Castle & Co.

Citations

  • 783 P.2d 1286
  • 245 Kan. 739
  • 783 P.2d 1296
  • 1989 Kan. LEXIS 191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In view of the decision reached, we need not address the procedural and other issues asserted by the Department.”
  • parent company held quarterly board meetings where management policies and decisions were explored in detail, whereas the subsidiary’s board generally acted by written consent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes, Six

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.