In re the Appeal in Santa Cruz County Juvenile Dependency Action Nos. JD-89-006 & JD-89-007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a trial court is justified in inferring that a defense counsel who is not called to testify would not have corroborated the acts and omissions that led to the alleged inadequate representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).