Skip to main content
· 6/21/1989

In Re the Appeal in Pima County Severance Action No. S-2397

Citations

  • 780 P.2d 407
  • 161 Ariz. 574
  • 37 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 57
  • 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that DCS is not required provide services that are already being received
  • DCS is not required to provide services that were already offered
  • DCS is not required to provide duplicative services

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livermore, Hathaway, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.