Skip to main content
· 1/9/1986

In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-78632

Citations

  • 712 P.2d 431
  • 147 Ariz. 584
  • 1986 Ariz. LEXIS 169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • legislature intended DES to have power to act for dependent child subject to juvenile court review
  • legislature \intended that [ADES] have power to act for the benefit of a dependent child subject to juvenile court review\
  • legislature “intended that [ADES] have power to act for the benefit of a dependent child subject to juvenile court review”
  • “[A] statute should be interpreted in such a way to give it a fair and sensible meaning.”
  • legislature “intended that [ADES] have power to act for the benefit of a dependent child subject to juvenile court review”
  • “[S]tatutes which relate to the same subject matter should be read together and all parts of the law on the same subject must be given effect, if possible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.