Skip to main content
· 1/7/1988

In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-6831

Citations

  • 748 P.2d 785
  • 155 Ariz. 556
  • 1988 Ariz. App. LEXIS 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that despite abandonment there would be no benefit from a severance or harm from the continuation of the parent's rights when there was a potential for a deeper relationship with the parent
  • noting that proof of a clear and convincing statutory ground for severance “must also show that [the] ground somehow deprives the parent of the ability to effectively care for the child.”
  • finding the existence of a statutory ground for severance that negatively effects a child to be relevant to the best-interests analysis
  • “In most cases, the presence of a statutory ground will have a negative effect on the children[,]” which supports a best interests finding.
  • “In most cases, the presence of a statutory ground will have a negative effect on the child[.]”
  • “In most cases, the presence of a statutory ground will have a negative effect on the children[,]” which supports a best interests finding.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Corcoran, Brooks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.