In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-6520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing A.R.S. § 8-533(B)(8)(a)’s predecessor, A.R.S. § 8-533(B)(6)(a) (one-year out-of-home placement ground), with A.R.S. § 8-533(B)(8)(c)’s predecessor, A.R.S. § 8-533(B)(6)(b) (two-year out-of-home placement ground)
• stating children had \adjusted to long term foster care\ and their chances for adoption were \described as 'slim' \
• explaining the grounds of out-of-home placement were not intended to allow termination when the court “know[s] full well that the child is unadoptable,” but then addressing “whether the evidence will support termination on the remaining ground”
• best interests of child in foster-adoptive home favored severance so child could be freed for adoption
• “[T]he parents’ inability to care for the child must show a danger to the child’s welfare.”
• “termination of parental rights ... must serve more than a casework goal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).