Skip to main content
· 6/17/1983

In re the Adoption of J.D.P.

Citations

  • 315 Pa. Super. 192
  • 461 A.2d 862
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding statements about former - 13 - servant's \character and capabilities\ conditionally privileged when made to prospective employer
  • conditional privilege in defamation action lost by proof of “malice in fact”; proof of “malice in fact” can be made in a number of ways
  • person discussing character and capabilities of former servant with prospective employer has qualified privilege
  • discussion of former servant’s character with prospective employer privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montgomery, Popovich, Voort

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.