In re the Adoption of I.R.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “Texas law does not per se disqualify a properly qualified biomechanical expert, who otherwise meets the requirements of Rule 702, from expressing opinions that will assist the jury in deciding injury causation questions”
• explaining expert testimony is relevant when it is “sufficiently tied to the facts of the case [so] that it will aid the jury in resolving a factual dispute”
• “Biomechanics is the study of the application or relation of the laws of mechanics to the body.”
• “Biomechanical experts are commonly designated when a [litigant] wish[es] to prove that a particular kind of injury might or might not result from an auto collision at a particular speed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).