In re the Adoption of Elizabeth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “an appellant is prohibited from raising new issues in a reply brief” (citation omitted)
• observing that review committee and review organization are distinct terms under the PRPA
• “[A]n appellant is prohibited from raising new issues in a reply brief.”
• “No principled reading of the definition of ‘professional health care provider’ permits any entity to qualify if it is not approved, licensed or otherwise regulated to practice or operate in the health care field under the laws of Pennsylvania.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).