Skip to main content
· 3/11/1958

In re the Accounting of Menzel

Citations

  • 5 A.D.2d 859
  • 171 N.Y.S.2d 369
  • 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6663

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘a substantial increase in the husband’s salary does not present a substantial change in circumstances to justify an upward modification of alimony’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank, McNally, Rabin, Stevens, Valente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.