In re T.H.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1372
Syllabus
Permanent custody manifest weight of the evidence clear and convincing evidence R.C. 2151.414(E) R.C. 2151.414(B) and (D). The trial court's decision to grant permanent custody of appellant's children was not against the manifest weight of the evidence and there was clear and convincing evidence in the record to support the court's decision. While appellant engaged in mental health, domestic violence, and anger management classes he was unable to show that he benefitted from services. Appellant did not establish sobriety and was continually angry and aggressive towards agency staff. Although the agency and the court gave appellant numerous chances, visitation had to be stopped due to appellant's volatile behavior.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re L.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 80×
- In re Ja.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.