Skip to main content
N.D. Ohio· 1/3/1985

In Re Terex Corp.

Citations

  • 45 B.R. 290
  • 1985 Bankr. LEXIS 6993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 9006 is the general time computation rule, must yield to the provisions of Rule 3003(c) governing Chapter 11 claims and therefore that the court has broader discretion to extend Chapter 11 claims deadlines than is provided by Rule 9006(b
  • B.R. 3003(c)(3) “appears to allow the court greater discretion than Rule 9006(b)(1)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harold F. White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re Terex Corp.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.