Skip to main content
· 7/19/2000

Federal Case

Citations

  • 221 F.3d 870
  • 47 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 407
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 17306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that certification of a mandatory class under Rule 23(b)(1)(B) “must be carefully scrutinized” because it lacks the protections of a Rule 23(b)(3) class
  • remanding to district court when “the form of the settlement call[ed] into question its fairness and raise[d] constitutional concerns”
  • one factor in determining whether a motion to intervene is timely is “the purpose for which intervention is sought”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.