In Re Teixeira

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering relationship of “historical” expenses incurred to “reasonably necessary” and “applicable” post-petition expenses allowable under the means test
• “Rather than use schedule J, Congress has substituted a different method for predicting debtor’s anticipated level of expenditure.”
• “Congress, in plain and unambiguous language, specifically excluded social security benefits from current monthly income. The result is that they are also excluded in calculating disposable income.”
• when “there has been a substantial change in circumstances such that the numbers contained in Form B22C are not commensurate with a fair projection of the debtor’s budget in the future ... debtors will use [sjchedule I to determine income.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).