In re T.E.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “due process requires that a higher standard—clear and convincing evidence—be imposed on the State whenever it seeks permanently to sever” parental rights
• explaining that “due process requires that a higher standard — clear and convincing evidence — be imposed on the State whenever it seeks permanently to sever” parental rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re R.W. and N.W.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-11-18· cited 71×
• In re G.F.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-02-23· cited 29×
• In re T.M. and A.M., Juveniles
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-02-12· cited 18×
• In re A.W.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-11-01· cited 13×
• In re A.W.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-01-21· cited 7×
• In re I.B., Juvenile
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-06-17· cited 6×
• In Re AW
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1998-01-21
• In Re TE
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-09-17
• In re A.W. and J.W.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2013-11-01

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santosky v. Kramer
  Supreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
• In re M. B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1986-03-28· cited 51×
• Ordinetz v. Springfield Family Center, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-02-07· cited 13×
• Board of Medical Practice v. Perry-Hooker
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-08-04· cited 3×