In re T.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statutory privilege applicable to communications to psychiatrist and psychologists
• statutory privilege applicable to communications to psychiatrist and psychologists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Interest of S.T.S., Jr.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-08-15· cited 80×
• Yocabet v. UPMC Presbyterian
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-06-05· cited 57×
• Commonwealth v. Pukowsky
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-08· cited 30×
• Kelley, M. v. Pittman, L.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-11-04· cited 9×
• Fisher, H. v. Erie Insurance Exchange
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-06-25· cited 9×
• In the Interest of: J.M.G., a Minor
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-22

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Harris
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-23· cited 112×
• Gormley v. Edgar
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-04-26· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Willson Products, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-10-09· cited 46×
• In the Interest of K.A.P.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-01-19· cited 39×
• Gates v. Gates
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-10· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Gerald
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-06-19· cited 24×
• In Re Petition to Compel Cooperation With Child Abuse Investigation
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-20· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Carter
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-02· cited 18×
• In Re Subpoena No. 22.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-02· cited 18×
• M.M. v. L.M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-09-12· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Appleby
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-19· cited 16×