Skip to main content

Citations

  • 685 S.E.2d 529
  • 200 N.C. App. 739
  • 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 1727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the respondent was not a custodian to the child where the record reflected no order awarding either legal or physical custody of the juvenile to the respondent and no evidence supported a finding that the respondent stood in loco parentis in relation to the child
  • concluding there was insufficient evidence as to whether maternal grandmother stood in loco parentis to T.B. where there was insufficient evidence as to whether the child’s placement “was intended to be temporary or permanent or its duration”
  • concluding there was insufficient evidence as to whether maternal grandmother stood in loco parentis to T.B. where there was insufficient evidence as to whether the child’s placement “was intended to be temporary or permanent or its duration”
  • standing “is a threshold issue that must be addressed, and found to exist, before the merits of [the] case are judicially resolved.”
  • standing “is a threshold issue that must be addressed, and found to exist, before the merits of [the] case are judicially resolved”
  • “[W]e are unable to conclude that [r]espondent’s actions are consistent with one who assumes the status and obligation of a parent[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beasley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.