In Re Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Rule 1.08 as \stating that an attorney must obtain written consent prior to entering a business transaction with a client\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Pace
  W.D. Texas· 2011-05-16· cited 17×
• In re Estate of Brown
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-08-23· cited 2×
• Osherow v. Nelson Hensley & Consolidated Fund Management, L.L.C. (In re Pace)
  W.D. Texas· 2011-05-16· cited 2×
• People v. Fisher
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2007-10-30

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Matter of Smith
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 30×
• Matter of Grimm
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 19×
• In Re Mears
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-02-18· cited 9×
• In Re Cherry
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 6×
• In re Taylor
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1973-03-21· cited 4×
• In Re Davis
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-01-10· cited 2×
• Matter of Taylor
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 2×
• Matter of Taylor
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-03-25· cited 1×
• Matter of Horine
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-02-16· cited 1×