Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/29/2012
In Re Taylor
Citations
- 723 S.E.2d 366
- 396 S.C. 627
- 2012 WL 652495
- 2012 S.C. LEXIS 44
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “As we have recognized, ‘[t]he primary purpose of disbarment ... is the removal of an unfit person from the profession for the protection of the courts and the public, not punishment of the offending attorney.’ ” (quoting In re Burr, 267 S.C. 419, 423, 228 S.E.2d 678, 680 (1976))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of BurrSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-09-30· cited 11×
- In Re JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-11-09· cited 5×
- In Re BoneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-11-15· cited 5×
- In Re KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-02-06· cited 3×
- In the Matter of CrummeySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-07-26· cited 3×
- In Re CunninghamSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-01-08· cited 3×
- In Re WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-03-10· cited 2×
- In Re TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-10-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.